Thursday, December 2, 2010

Theo Pauline Nestor: Fighting for Custody of My Stepfather

A year or so after he walked me down the aisle, my beloved stepfather disappeared. My parents--that's what I'd always called my mother and my stepfather--hadn't quite called it quits. But my stepfather--my dad, the only man I'd ever thought of as Dad--had dropped out of my life.

Like most of the things that break our hearts, his disappearance happened so slowly and insidiously that it took months for me to recognize what had happened. First, he wasn't home when I phoned. He traveled a lot for work and I lived in another state, so the gap between phone visits wasn't anything unheard of. But after a couple months of not touching base with him, I asked my mother point blank where he was. She said something hazy and unsatisfying like they were "taking a break" or "trying to work things out."

I was thirty-one years old, and suddenly I was the divorced kid all over again. My dad was leaving me. And what real claim did I have on him anyway? Didn't he have every right to pack up and move on? People had always asked me, "He's your stepdad, right? Not your real dad?" A question I was never sure how to answer because to me he was my real dad.

I already had behind me a lifetime of feeling like I was on shaky ground in the father department. A lifetime of feeling like I wasn't a regular kid with a regular dad. Except for when I was with him. My stepfather had always made me feel like we were the real deal ever since my parents' honeymoon, since the first time I experimentally called him Dad from a Topanga Canyon swimming pool and he turned from the poolside crowd and said "Yes?" without flinching. Once--years later--my fortune cookie read: "Always give the child the extra piece of cake." I carried that fortune around in my wallet for years because it reminded me so much of him.

But now he was gone. And I began to wonder if he'd meant more to me than I meant to him. The untethered feeling that was the legacy of my family's serial divorcing was back. My "real" father had married four times in his 59 years; my stepfather was my mother's third husband. I was back to being the divorce-kid fumbling through again--dreading holidays, dodging questions about family, and wondering when I'd see him again. Or if.

And then the phone rang.

We talked for a few minutes about who-knows-what and then I asked, "Where are you?"

"I can't tell you," he said.

"What do you mean you can't tell me?" I asked but what I was really asking was are you my dad or aren't you?

"I don't want your mother to know where I am."

So that's how it was now. The chips were down. And when the chips were down, I was my mother's child. Biology trumped love every time.

But I needed him too much to just to give up. And now I was shouting: "But I'm NOT my mother and why won't you really tell me where you are?"

"Because," he said, "I'm afraid of your mother."

And that was when the distance between us shortened. He'd told me the truth. I told him I understood and then we started talking of other things. A few minutes later, he told me he was in Florida, which suddenly seemed to me like the most questionable state in the country, a refuge for retirement-age runaways, a place where the endless sun burned away the trail of one's past.

But now my stepfather and I were bonded in a new way. We were bonded now by one of divorce's unholy legacies: by a secret. But, I'd lived with secrets with before. I was willing to do it again. What I wasn't willing to give up--what I wouldn't let divorce take from me again--was my dad.


Read more from me on my blog, Writing is My Drink. The series titled Alienated Youth is My Drink talks about my relationship with my stepfather.

?

?

?

Follow Theo Pauline Nestor on Twitter: www.twitter.com/howtosleepalone

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Josh Ozersky: Susur Lee's Reverse Course Meal

Why do they always try and fill you up with bread and butter when you have veal chops coming a little later? This question prompted Susur Lee to rethink Western sensibilities concerning meal order.

?

?

?

Follow Josh Ozersky on Twitter: www.twitter.com/OzerskyTV

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Spurs vs Warriors: Spurs beat Warriors, 118-98

To win during the seven-game stretch that started Tuesday night, the Warriors are going to need to play close to perfect basketball, and they weren’t anywhere close against San Antonio.

The Spurs turned the Warriors into a jump-shooting team, took advantage of 16 turnovers and had the best two players on the floor in a 118-98 victory that sent 17,877 fans racing for the Oracle Arena exits with 4 1/2 minutes left.

“I didn’t think we had the energy necessary to play against this team,” Warriors coach Keith Smart said. “I think we were a little stagnant here and there, and they invited us to take the jump shot. I think sometimes our guys drive to the hole and don’t get a call, so that puts them in a jump-shooting mind-set.”

Trouble awaits. The game marked the first of a stretch for the Warriors in which they play six teams with winning records. They’ve beaten only two teams with winning records this season (Utah and New York).

Related Post

Keyword: , , , , , ,

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Robert Scheer: Hillary Gets Wiki-Served

Hillary Clinton should cut out the whining about what the Obama administration derides as "stolen cables" and confront the unpleasant truths they reveal about the contradictions of U.S. foreign policy and her own troubling performance. As with the earlier batch of WikiLeaks, in this latest release the corruption of our partners in Iraq and Afghanistan stands in full relief, and the net effect of nearly a decade of warfare is recognized as a strengthening of Iran's influence throughout the region.

Do we as voters not have a need to know that our State Department says that Ahmed Wali Karzai, the half brother of the Afghan leader we are backing and himself the head of government in the most contested province, "is widely understood to be corrupt and a narcotics trafficker"? Or that authorities working with our Drug Enforcement Administration discovered Afghanistan's then-vice president smuggling $52 million in cash out of his country, a nation that U.S. taxpayers are bankrolling?

In the cable discussing Ahmed Wali Karzai, or AWK as he is called, there is a pithy description of the basic folly of our attempt to control the uncontrollable land of Afghanistan: "The meeting with AWK highlights one of our major challenges in Afghanistan: how to fight corruption and connect the people to their government, when the key government officials are themselves corrupt."

The cables make a hash of claims that our invasion of Iraq--where al-Qaida could not operate when Saddam Hussein was in power--was helpful in the war on terror. Recall that 15 of the 9/11 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia. Yet the WikiLeaks documents reveal, as The New York Times reported, that "Saudi donors remain the chief financiers of Sunni militant groups like Al Qaeda, and the tiny Persian Gulf state of Qatar, a generous host to the American military for years, was the 'worst in the region' in counterterrorism efforts, according to a State Department cable last December."

While the great threat is now said by Clinton's State Department to emanate from Iran, the cables make clear that Iranian power was much enhanced by the U.S. overthrow of Saddam, who had fought a long, bloody war against the ayatollahs. The result of our invasion is an Iraqi government run by Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, described in the cables as being much under the influence of Iran, which orchestrated his deal with the Iranian-backed Sadrists that kept him in power. The cables report King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia dismissing Maliki as no more than an "Iranian agent."

This material refutes the stated anti-terrorist purposes of the two wars we are fighting, and that is the prime reason it is classified. If any of the information was so sensitive, why was none of it labeled "top secret" as is the practice with content that would risk our nation's security? And why was this vast trove placed in computer systems to which low-ranking personnel had access? The real problem with the release of the dispatches, particularly the kind labeled "noforn," meaning it shouldn't be shared with foreign governments, is that it is politically embarrassing--which is why we, the public, have a right to view it. That is certainly the case with the revelation that Secretary Clinton destroyed the once-sacred line between the legitimate diplomat deserving of universal protection and the spies that governments could be justified in arresting.

Instead of disparaging the motives of the leakers, Hillary Clinton should offer a forthright explanation of why she continued the practice of Condoleezza Rice, her predecessor as secretary of state, of using American diplomats to spy on their colleagues working at the United Nations. Why did she issue a specific directive ordering U.S. diplomats to collect biometric information on U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and many of his colleagues?
As the respected British newspaper The Guardian, which obtained the WikiLeaks cables, said in summarizing the matter: "A classified directive which appears to blur the line between diplomacy and spying was issued to US diplomats under Hillary Clinton's name in July 2009, demanding forensic technical details about the communications system used by top UN officials, including passwords and personal encryption keys used in private and commercial networks for official communications."

The Guardian pointed out that the Clinton directive violates the language of the original U.N. convention, which reads: "The premises of the United Nations shall be inviolable." The spying effort derived from concern that U.N. rapporteurs might unearth embarrassing details about the U.S. treatment of prisoners in Guantánamo as well as in Iraq and Afghanistan. One of the directives demanded "biographic and biometric" information on Dr. Margaret Chan, the director of the World Health Organization, as well as details of her personality and management style. Maybe she's hiding bin Laden in her U.N. office.

?

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

HP Mini 5103 N455 10.1 250/2GB Laptop Deals (43%) off

HP Mini 5103

HP Mini 5103

HP Smartbuy Mini 5103 Intel Atom Processor N455 (1.66 GHz, 512 KB L2 Cache, 667 MHz FSB) 10.1-inch diagonal LED-backlit WSVGA anti-glare (1024 x 600), 2MP Webcam, 250 GB 7200 rpm 2.5-inch hard drive, 2 GB 667 MHz DDR3 SDRAM (1D), Broadcom 43224AGN 802.11 a/b/g/n 2×2 Wi-Fi Adapter + Bluetooth, 10/100/1000 NIC, Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3150, HP 6-Cell 66 Wh Li-Ion Battery, HP Protect Tools Security Manager, HP Disk Sanitizer, Setup Password, Power-On Password, Kensington Lock Slot and Support for Computrace Lojack Pro, Genuine Windows 7 Professional 32.

Product Features

  • 250GB 10.1IN WSVGA W7 PRO 32

Processor, Memory, and Motherboard

  • Hardware Platform: Unknown
  • Processor: 0 MHz Unknown
  • Number of Processors: 1
  • RAM: 0 MB
  • RAM Type: Unknown

Hard Drive

Cases and Expandability

  • Size (LWH): 13.39 inches, 11.6 inches, 4.19 inches
  • Weight: 5.29 pounds

Related Post

Keyword: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Golf Buddy Tour GPS Range Finder (37% off) Best Cyber Monday Deal 2010

Golf Buddy Tour GPS

Golf Buddy Tour GPS

Take the guesswork out of your golf game with the GolfBuddy Tour, a true GPS unit with automatic course and hole recognition. The GolfBuddy Tour–which comes pre-loaded with course information from across the world–helps you gain confidence on the course by telling you exactly how far and where to go with every shot. The unit is equipped with a large, easy-to-read screen that gives you the exact distance to greens, bunkers, lakes, lay-up points, and hazards. The view of the green is dynamic, meaning the GolfBuddy Tour changes the shape of the green depending on your angle of approach. Need to know whether the trees on the right are in play, or whether the far bunker is within range of your 7-iron? Just grab the GolfBuddy Tour and it provides all the information you need. Plus, there’s no need to aim the GPS to obtain distance information, as the GolfBuddy Tour automatically recognizes your surroundings. Just turn it on and play.

  • Golf rangefinder with true GPS capabilities and automatic course and hole recognition
  • Comes preloaded with course information from throughout the world
  • Provides the exact distance to greens, bunkers, lakes, lay-up points, and hazards
  • Large, easy-to-read screen; stores up to 20,000 courses and 1,000 scores
  • Measures 2.25 x 4.25 x 1 inches (W x H x D); weighs 4.23 ounces; 90-day warranty

Related Post

Keyword: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Swati Desai, Ph.D., LCSW: Materialism Is Not Bad... As Long As It's Tempered with Spirituality

President Obama had a hugely successful trip to India, a country that shares several political and economical values with the U.S. Amongst other things, he had an impressive question-and-answer session with students in Mumbai who asked him tough questions. One student referred to the modern, materialistic frame of thought, asking the president what methodologies a government could adopt to incorporate core spiritual values such as selflessness and brotherhood. The president pointed out the government's role in removing poverty and encouraging the spirit of "giving" and philanthropy.


The question raises an important issue relevant to our daily lives: could we and should we to seek material prosperity and spirituality at the same time? Note that the question is about both the "should" and the "could."

When I was growing up in a middle-class Brahmin family in the 1960s in India, the values around me taught me that the acquisition of knowledge is important in itself, regardless of the money that the knowledge might bring me. My father's old teacher, who was obviously of very modest means, was treated with utmost respect in our house. This India, although materialistically poor and politically left-leaning, was spiritually prosperous, known for its messages on how to transcend the perils of ordinary life. The U.S. at that time was spiritually wandering, materialistically prospering, on a tremendous upswing, believing in making one's own destiny, and lured by being the superpower in defense, technology and economics.

How things have changed since then! India is now materialistically prospering and spiritually confused. On the other hand, in the U.S. the realization has come about that material excesses do not give meaning to our lives and are an unreliable source of happiness.

Neither one of the countries seems to have a good grip on both at the same time. Why does it seem so tricky to mix materialism (in an economic sense) and spirituality? There are at least two reasons.

First, they have conflicting emphases. Spirituality implies connecting with the inner truth and the larger universal reality, outside our ordinary life experiences, and thus includes the inner sense of morality, as well as concern for humanity beyond our mere selfish interests. Economic materialism is very much about collecting and spending resources, particularly money and time. One is about the intangible spirit, and the other about daily life's concerns.

Secondly, materialism comes more naturally, in spite of the fact that we know that it often leads to a lifestyle that is perpetually wanting more, ruthlessly self-centered, desperately greedy and often taking pleasure in ostentatious displays as a source of power. Spirituality, on the other hand, it is much more difficult to pursue, in spite of the fact that we know that it is associated with long-term happiness and feeling the right thing.

This is what I suggest. The question of "should" we or "could" we mix these two in our life is not the right one, because for a common person to have a good and fulfilling life, it is inevitable to make a potion of both materialism and spirituality. In fact, we use one to balance the other in the following way:

We use spirituality as a greed- and envy-stopper. Spirituality, getting in touch with our inner and universal reality, would make it difficult for a materialist to engage in ruthlessly self-centered behavior, because any inner truth includes the innate human goodness. We allow the practice of spirituality to monitor the greed and envy, which seem to be at the heart of why materialism gets excessive, leaving the world around us a worse place.

We use materialism to stay in touch with the realities of daily life, recognizing that amassing resources is a source of security, survival and freedom to experience life. Desire is a life force, and when practiced with wisdom, it can create beauty. The wisdom lies in recognizing that modesty, cooperation and compassion, when combined with materialism, can indeed be a source of creativity, satisfaction, peace and prosperity. Spiritual values have the power to create such wisdom. The counter-balance to the perils of materialism can come from compassion -- a possible product of spiritual thinking. The Dalai Lama predicts that the 21st century will be happier because people have become more caring and compassionate.

However, there is one caveat! In order to understand this potion, you will need to know what it means by being without! If life hasn't already brought it to you, consider going to a place (a sparse retreat, not a resort) where your pride of "me and mine" and the habits of possession can fall apart. Do this with awareness.

Note that the difficulty in practicing spirituality without material prosperity lies not only in the fact that "it is hard to preach to an empty stomach," but also in the fact that spirituality, if not balanced, could lead to forced austerity, and eventually bitter dogmatism. Even at its best, practiced as a completely self-sufficient existence turned towards inner beauty, spirituality could become self-centered and deny the realities of the daily life. In this sense, it still may not create a better world.

President Obama emphasized the need for "giving" as a value when you become materially prosperous. I would like to point out that incorporating spirituality also includes encouraging the innate goodness that humans seem to possess, which will the government can encourage by creating institutions in which doing the right things can lead to prosperity (such as success without having to succumb to corruption, very much needed in India), and in which the right moral values get highlighted (such as regulating greed, very much needed in the U.S.).

?

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here