Showing posts with label Election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Election. Show all posts

Sunday, November 7, 2010

Midterm Election Impact On Stock Market

NEW YORK — Next year will be a year unlike any other for the stock market.

The Republican takeover of the House of Representatives on Tuesday means Wall Street will be contending with three situations in 2011 that drive stock prices:

_ The year before a president faces re-election.

_ The year after a president has lost control of Congress.

_ The second year of a fragile economic expansion.

The market often behaves a certain way in each of those situations, but history isn't helpful now because investors have never faced this trifecta before. What's clear is that what happens in Washington will be watched even more closely by investors next year.

"This election is more important than the average one because of all of the economic and policy issues that remain uncertain," says Robert Doll, the chief investment strategist at BlackRock, an investing firm with $3.4 trillion in assets under management.

Any mishandling of the economy by politicians will mean that "the fragile economic recovery we have is going to be hit over the head, and we would have to think about a double-dip recession all over again," Doll says.

Here's a look at the three situations coinciding next year an dhow they coulf affect the stock market:

_THE YEAR BEFORE A PRESIDENT RUNS FOR ELECTION:

Since 1945, the Dow Jones industrial average has gained an average of 19 percent the year before a sitting president runs. That's more than double the 7.9 percent average annual gain during the same period. If you take out the 10 years when the president was running, the average gain drops to only 5.8 percent.

No one has been able to prove why this happens. One theory is that the president pushes through politically popular spending measures to help his re-election. But that doesn't explain why the market also tends to rise in the third year of a president's second term. The Dow rose 25.2 percent, for example, in 1999, the third year of President Clinton second term. Since 1902 the Dow has gained, on average, 13.7 percent in the third year of a president's first term and 10.9 percent in the third year of a president's second term.

_THE YEAR AFTER A PRESIDENT LOSES CONTROL OF CONGRESS

Presidents whose party controlled both houses of Congress have lost at least one chamber five times in the past 80 years. Stock returns in the following year haven't followed a pattern. The Dow plunged 53 percent in 1931 and gained 34 percent in 1995. Gains in the other three years ranged from 2.2 percent to 20.8 percent. That makes it impossible to forecast what will happen this time. The change in Congress in 1931 came during the Great Depression, while the 1995 transition came during the first part of the Internet boom. The next Congress faces a fragile economic period, which could mean that the market offers another single-digit gain like this year.

Gridlock hasn't been great for stocks. Since 1945, the Standard and Poor's 500 index has gained 4 percent in years when Congress was split between parties. It increased 8 percent when Congress was controlled by one party and the White House another. When a single party was in control of Washington, the index gained an average of 11 percent.

_SLOW-GROWING ECONOMY

The economy is growing at a 2 percent annual rate, according to the latest estimate by the Commerce Department. That's slow by historical standards and shows that the end of the recession 17 months ago hasn't translated into a robust economic expansion.

Stocks have been in a bull market for 18 months, pushing the Dow up 70 percent since it hit a 12-year low in March 2009. That gain is larger than normal but isn't surprising considering that the rally followed the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. During slow recoveries like this one, bull markets typically last 30 months and bring gains of 44 percent overall, according to Ned Davis Research.

Corporate profits are improving, and wealthy consumers are starting to make some costly purchases. If the economy continues to improve, stocks will likely rise. But don't expect large gains because the economy needs to grow 3 percent or more to bring down the country's 9.6 percent unemployment rate. That's unlikely soon because residential and commercial construction remains weak, and construction fuels economic recoveries.

So what's an investor to do given this abnormal year? The best thing may be to follow your long-term plans regardless of what happens in Washington.

"There's no way to tell what's going to happen, or we would all be rich," says Paul Larson, the chief equities strategist at Morningstar.

Get HuffPost Business On Twitter, Facebook, and Google?Buzz!

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Friday, November 5, 2010

Vermont Governor Election: Legislature May Decide Race's Winner

MONTPELIER, Vt. — With a governor's race too close to call hours after the polls closed, Vermont lawmakers – not voters – could find themselves picking the winner.

With 89 percent of precincts reporting early Wednesday, Democrat Peter Shumlin had 49.4 percent of the vote compared to 47.9 percent for Republican Brian Dubie.

Under the Vermont Constitution, if no gubernatorial candidate receives 50 percent of the vote plus one vote, lawmakers vote by secret ballot when they convene their new session in January.

The close race is all too familiar for Shumlin. He led in balloting in Vermont's five-way Democratic gubernatorial primary but wasn't declared the winner until after a recount.

If vote totals end up within 2 percentage points of each other, a recount could be requested.

Get HuffPost Politics On Twitter, Facebook, and Google?Buzz! Subscribe to the new HuffPost Hill newsletter!

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Florida Election Results 2010: Rick Scott Leads Alex Sink

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — Republican Rick Scott clung to a razor-thin lead early Wednesday over Democrat Alex Sink, saying he was "absolutely confident" he'd prevail. Sink vowed not to give up until "all the people of Florida have their voices heard."

With 99 percent of the expected vote from Tuesday's election counted, Scott had 49 percent while Sink had 48 percent.

"I am absolutely confident I will be the next great governor of the State of Florida," Scott told a crowd of hundreds of giddy but exhausted voters in Fort Lauderdale just after 2 a.m. "We look forward to finishing the count. We know we're going to win."

Still, the race remained too close to call, with just tens of thousands of votes separating the candidates out of more than 5 million cast. Sink's party ended with the Democrat telling supporters "We are coming down to the wire in what looks to be a dead-even race."

Sink was pinning her hopes on still-uncounted votes in Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade and Hillsborough counties. It remained unclear how many ballots were outstanding. To trigger an automatic machine recount, Sink would need to cut Scott's lead to 0.5 percent or less.

Voters on both sides of the aisle were hopeful their pick would prevail after a fiercely contentious, incredibly expensive race.

Scott, 57, is a multimillionaire who unexpectedly jumped into the Republican primary race in April. With an antiestablishment message and tea party backing, the political newcomer proceeded to spend about $73 million of his family's money beating Attorney General Bill McCollum for the GOP nomination and then taking on Sink.

After the August primary, he quickly picked up the backing of state GOP leaders, many of whom had worked to defeat him, and began to paint Sink as a "Tallahassee insider" who marches in lockstep with President Barack Obama.

Scott's albatross in the campaign has been his leadership of Columbia/HCA, a hospital conglomerate that ended up paying $1.7 billion in fines to settle federal charges of Medicaid and Medicare fraud.

Scott, who founded the company and built it into the largest for-profit hospital chain in the world, said he didn't know anything about criminal activity and was never charged, but now assumes responsibility for what happened on his watch. He wanted to fight the charges, but was forced out by his board in 1997.

Sink, 62, worked for 26 years in the banking business, eventually becoming one of the state's most prominent businesswomen. As Florida president of NationsBank – which later became Bank of America – she oversaw 9,000 employees, 800 branch banks throughout the state and $40 billion in customer deposits.

After parting ways with the bank in 2000, Sink stepped up to take a high-profile role in the failed gubernatorial campaign of her husband when he opposed Jeb Bush in 2002.

Then, positioning herself as an outsider, she won the job of Florida's chief financial officer in 2006 in her first ever election. The CFO is the Cabinet officer who not only pays the state's bills but has such other varied duties as regulating funeral homes, overseeing the fire marshal's office and investigating insurance fraud.

The winner will replace Charlie Crist on Jan. 4. He ran for the U.S. Senate instead of seeking a second term. Crist lost the race to Marco Rubio Tuesday.

__

Stacy reported from Tampa, Fla.

Get HuffPost Politics On Twitter, Facebook, and Google?Buzz! Subscribe to the new HuffPost Hill newsletter!

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Mark Goulston, M.D.: Election 2010: Will You Be a Good Sport on Wednesday?

Will you go gently and cooperatively into Wednesday after the elections, or will you rage against the winners you didn't vote for?

If immature love is loving people for what they do right and mature love is loving them in spite of what they do wrong, will you be able to give your full support to whoever is elected and help them succeed in their position even if you didn't vote for them?

If you are able to do that, you are not only mature, you have "object constancy." Object constancy is the ability to maintain a positive connection to a person, a goal and in the most important category, hope, in the face of disappointment, hurt, frustration and upset.

It is sometimes a matter of temperament, because there are those lucky individuals who by nature see the good in the bad and the half filled cup. Often, however it is a matter of maturity, in that the more immature you are (as with many kids and people who refuse to grow up that you and I know all too well), the more likely you are to respond to disappointment or even a simple "No" with "I hate you!" "You're not my friend!" "Let's just get a divorce!" "That's okay, because I just might as well kill myself!"

I am not advocating that one should tolerate physical, sexual or mental abuse without fighting back or cutting your losses. In that regard I try to follow the wise words from one of my late mentors, Walter Dunn: "Confront evil at the earliest opportunity, but for everyone else who is just flawed, cut them some slack."

?

?

?

Follow Mark Goulston, M.D. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/markgoulston

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here