Showing posts with label Christina. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christina. Show all posts

Sunday, November 21, 2010

Christina Patterson: Politicians on Reality TV are a Good Reason to Get Out Your Gun

To the man in Wisconsin who shot his TV when he saw Bristol Palin on Dancing With The Stars, I have one word to say: respect. I imagine that he, like me, usually only watches adaptations of works by 19th-century novelists, adaptations that involve crinolines and bonnets, but definitely not sequins, and was disappointed that there were sequins, but no bonnets.

I imagine that he, like me, also found it a little bit depressing that you can't switch on the telly now without seeing a politician, or a politician's child, wiggling their hips in moves that are clearly meant to emulate sexual intercourse, even if they've never had it, or even if they are members of a religion that says you mustn't have it unless you're married, which you aren't. I imagine that he thinks that if you liked dancing you would be dancing, instead of slumped on a sofa eating a family pack of Doritos and watching people dancing, just as if you liked football, you would be kicking a ball and not a telly.

I imagine that he was just feeling a bit fed up. He may, for example, have been watching the programme about Bristol's mother, who is also a hockey mom and a mama grizzly, which is a special kind of mother from which key parts of the brain have been surgically removed, and he may have watched her climbing mountains and leaping across crevasses and catching bears and fishing for salmon, and he may have thought that the woman who, two years ago, ran to be Vice-President of the world's only superpower, and who is now planning to run as President, was beginning to look a bit like Vladimir Putin.

I don't think he would have thought that she looked physically very like Vladimir Putin, who used to be a president and is hoping to be one again, because although you can put lipstick on a pig, and you can put an awful lot of lipstick on a presidential candidate, even when they're watching bears or fishing, you can't really put it on a Russian Prime Minister, or, if you did, he would look a bit less masculine than the photos of him sitting on horses or fishing, sometimes without even a top on, would suggest he wants to. But he might have thought that the fact that she liked doing the same kind of things as a man who seemed to be really rather nasty wasn't a brilliant sign, and nor was the fact that she liked doing them in front of TV crews.

He might, in fact, have thought that when politicians, or ex-politicians, or aspiring politicians, start doing things in front of TV crews that you would usually only do when their weren't any TV crews, it was usually a sign that they might be a bit confused about what was their life and what was pretending to be their life, about what, in other words, was truth and what was lies, and that they might, in fact, think that there was no difference. He might think that where this applied to a very silly former member of the British Parliament who was hanging around in a jungle with a bunch of other people who were called "celebrities", but most of which nobody had ever heard of, to make a programme that it was too painful to watch, that it didn't really matter because, although the man didn't seem to have anything that you might call common sense, or knowledge of human nature, or of himself, he was unlikely to hold any kind of public office again and might need to earn some kind of living by taking part in televised freak shows, which certainly wouldn't do any good to anyone, but might not do any harm. But he might think that when this applied to politicians who wanted to make the laws, and policies, that would shape millions of people's lives, and even, in some cases, determine the length of them, it might matter quite a lot.

He might also think that politicians who thought a lot about how they appeared on TV, so that in some cases they had hair transplants and plastic surgery, and also bought up most of the TV stations, and in other cases wore stacked-up heels, and made people stand on boxes, so that they wouldn't look small, even though they were, didn't tend to be the people who did the most to make other people's lives better.

He might think that he was very lucky to live in a country which, although it seemed to have an awful lot of very, very, very stupid people living in it, people who thought that the best way to run a country was not to run it, but to be like grizzly bears who look after baby grizzly bears, but don't, apparently, give a monkey's about anyone else, and where quite a lot of these people were running for political office, and one of them even wants to be president, by some amazing quirk of fate, or luck, or perhaps by an act of God, but not the God of the people who want grizzly government, has a President who is thoughtful and intelligent and brave.

It has a President who, when he was asked to feign emotions, because he lives in a country which prefers emotion to thought, refused to, and when he was asked to act a part, because he lives in a country which likes acting, refused to, and who prefers to sit in a study and write books than strike poses on mountains. It is this President who has managed to do something that presidents for a century have tried, and failed, to achieve, which is to pass a bill to make sure that people, even mentally ill people who fire guns at their TVs, can get treatment from doctors or in hospitals, even if they're not rich.

It is this President, who is very far from perfect, because no politician anywhere is perfect, but who is trying to make things better for poor people, though most people, including quite a lot of the poor people, don't seem to want to let him, who will, in two years' time, probably be running against the woman who prefers grizzly bears to people. If he doesn't, or if he does and doesn't win, we might think it would be a good idea if someone fired a gun at us, too.

?

Follow Christina Patterson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/queenchristina_

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Saturday, November 20, 2010

Christina Aguilera Bares All In Burlesque (Video)

Christina Aguilera

Christina Aguilera

It’s not just the silk sheath dress into which she’s almost managed to squeeze herself. Or the silver bracelets that jangle merrily as she stalks through the door. Or the full makeup of one who knows she’s on display. Or the white Papillon dog — name of “Stinky” — trotting behind her. Or the common touches: the bowl of vegetable soup she’s busily eating, or the furry blanket spread over her knees.

There’s also the simple fact that Christina Aguilera exudes presence as soon as she walks into a room. This is what 30 million albums can do, not to mention those five Grammy Awards and four No. 1 singles on the Billboard charts.

As she approaches her 30th birthday on Dec. 18, she exudes confidence and authority, despite the fact that her latest project — the gaudy musical, Burlesque — takes her into the challenging new territory of acting, singing and dancing on screen.

“I had so many bruises every day,” she says. She especially remembers reprising Marilyn Monroe’s old number, Diamonds Are a Girl’s Best Friend, before the cameras.

“I was whipping that long strand of diamonds around. . . . I smacked my legs so many times in rehearsal before I got it right.”

Burlesque, which opens Nov. 24, marked the first time in her life she really had to dance. The bits of footwork she’s done in live performance don’t really count.

“I’m vocals first, so I’m very much about my mike and working everything around my vocals, but here everything was pre-recorded, so I fully had to solely concentrate on the dancing.”

The bottom line? “Doing this movie was the hardest thing I’ve ever done in my life.”

Keyword: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Christina Gagnier: Privacy and The Trigger Effect: A Swift Kick In...

The privacy conversation has devolved to a continual return to the idea that people no longer care about it and the new social norm is, I suppose by default, a public existence. Some aver that this view is generational; others ring the death knell for privacy altogether.

It is tempting to accept this proposition. People enjoy that instant publication gives them their 15 minutes of fame, through You Tube and other platforms. The national obsession with a show like Jersey Shore renders people to want to share their own "GTL" even if their only venue to broadcast is Facebook, not MTV.

The convergence of "reality media," social networks and instant publication have led to the misconception that privacy is dead; rather, we remain in our own societal beta test of the global power of the social net. The movements online to thwart the efforts of companies like Facebook do not lack change potential; they are merely impersonal. For digital natives and the rest of us, valuing privacy has always required some sort of a contextual element, a lesson, a moment or an incident that causes us to value privacy. Privacy is subject to a trigger effect.

For some, it is a violation of intimacy barriers that triggers a new concern over privacy. For others, it may be a lesson learned the hard way that the real world and the virtual world are not that distinct. Your colleague saw that unseemly Facebook post. Dartmouth considered not only what you wrote on your admissions essay, but what you tweeted. Your boss discovered that you "checked" into Disneyland on FourSquare the day you called in sick. The implications of our own behavior, not the behavior of the social networks themselves, will create the shift back to privacy, individual by individual.

A New York Times piece from last Friday, The Facebook Skeletons Come Out, highlights some trigger situations for individuals who have already learned that social networks throw us into the "frying pan." For the thirteen year old who has not known a world without the Internet and being a "public figure," we may find that this thirteen year-old will find themselves at eighteen, twenty-four or thirty with a set of information security values that we today are arguing is the antiquated notion of "privacy." To act as a proxy for those who cannot make the decision about this value themselves, whether by virtue of age or lack of access to technology, is irresponsible.

In an interview with Hemanshu Nigam, Chief Security Officer of MySpace, regarding children's privacy, Nigam noted that society has been focused on, particularly with children, inappropriate contact and content online, such as pornography or violent video games. It has not been until recently that this conversation has been opened up to include conduct. It is the new shift to conduct where the decision about privacy will be made.

The swift kick in our cultural derriere will be the realization that your "15 minutes" takes 15 seconds to download.

?

Follow Christina Gagnier on Twitter: www.twitter.com/gagnier

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Christina Gagnier: Get Your "Riot" Badge on Foursquare

Getting status updates from afar, Los Angelinos and others are getting a front row seat to the riots that have now broken out in San Francisco in honor of the 2010 World Series Champions, the San Francisco Giants . Unlike Los Angeles, where when riots break out over a NBA Finals victory of our hometown Lakers, just the local affiliates are covering the mess, the San Francisco tech scene has jumped in on Twitter, Facebook and Foursquare to spread the latest riot updates.

Technology breaks down all sorts of boundaries, but the geeks have gone mad tonight in San Francisco.

1) There is a mayor on Foursquare of a riot happening in the Haight...or Hayes Valley. The tweets are flying by so fast. (RT @netik: RT @danwrong: Only in SF: people checking into the riot on Foursquare. (via @amiendon)

2) Twitter is being used to advertise for developers...who are at the riots. Retweeted by @Scobleizer: "If you run into any great developers at the #SFRiot, please send them our way."

3) Antoine Dodson is once again a meme: @kevinrose: "hide your kids/wife! #giants"

And, of course, the Los Angeles tech scene fights back: @TheMan: "Self righteous SF people always ragged on LA for rioting during Lakers championships. Look who's rioting now #hypocrisy."

@strngways sums up the situation nicely: "SF riot: 100 folks causing problems. 10,000 people tweeting it."

?

Follow Christina Gagnier on Twitter: www.twitter.com/gagnier

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Saturday, October 30, 2010

Christina Patterson: Risks to talk live on race

It's not all fun is monstered. Poor Katharine Birbalsingh, the former Marxist was hailed as a Messiah of the Conservative Party Conference, is back in London liberal as Judas.

Bad enough, one might think of the surreal experience of being clutch matron fold way to England and have pictures of her students met with the kind of art you can expect in a zoo, or perhaps in a House, but to get back to find you are suspended and then dismissed, and your name in the Metropolitan Liberal circles drop you is now mud - well, this is what one of your new friends might call a show poor jolly.

"Birbalsingh, it seems, noir.Ce is not immediately obvious his picture, but in a country where a permanent-tanned, former Prime Minister is classified as white, and several beautiful blonde people Métis, including a friend to me, I always thought was white until she told me she was black, are always classified according to their darkest parent, he is regarded as important.Cela means that you cannot go towers saying""white woman", people tend not anyway, but you can go towers saying"as a black woman", although Birbalsingh, so I can gather, do.

This also means that the so-called representation of ears (black and ethnic minorities) conservative Conference was massively increased, Samantha Cameron who happened to be filmed while sitting next to a couple of Asian beautiful appearance and may, as well as introduced Indian dancers for occasionally also were black David Cameron.

But Birbalsingh, perhaps because she is black and therefore much more likely to end up in prison, committed a crime.Elle mentioned "black underachievement", you are allowed to speak, because it is the kind of thing that you can place on a form, but that she said something terrible. She said that black underachievement was not as a result of "institutional racism", which you are also allowed to put on a form, but, at least in part, "accusations of racism", which you do not. She said that when lawyers argue against the exclusion of a black boy in school and succeed in obtaining him readmitted, then all other black boys "search this invincible child and copy its bad example. Black children blunted, she says, "as a result of the well-intentioned liberal made for him".

Well, it is so many crimes that we would need an employment tribunal to untangle them.You can't say things like "all other blacks boys" do this or that, because it is generalize it stereotypes and is racist. And you can't say things like "well-intentioned liberal" because, for the well intentioned liberal (but not Tory non-inter alia-good-sense), it looks like a label and labels are others forms give you their, check boxes, and well-meaning liberals try helping black, yeah?and as they are, not racist and some of their best friends are noirs.Mais, perhaps longer.

The Birbalsingh black friends are, apparently, not themselves with its rice paddies truths.This is his "white liberal bourgeois friends" who waltzed off the coast with smelling.Il salts is fortunate that they were not with me when a friend of mine was announced after an afternoon of chaos that had we risk being charged with GHB, can not be done business with black people because they are so bloody disorganized and cannot remain work for them, because they are still demanding a rabais.Je assumes that he was not talking black on the face of the planet, but in quite general terms, based on his experience of blacks, individual, because he is black, is broad enough.

I guess that it was not really talk about colour, either.What he was talking about was culture, which in this case, was largely Caribbean, as his parents, and in which, for example, time is not a door which sharply behind you, but a beautiful door you can swing open at any time, and favours are something give you freely to friends and family and ask freely, sometimes even a person who is only in the sense most remote "brother" and hospitality towards East, such as various friends exhausted mine can testify, distant relatives offered limitless.

If you choose to stick to certain aspects of this culture even when you're in another culture, then you can, for example, be a great person as a friend or relative, but you would be a good person to have your entreprise.Et if you belong to a group in a class who prefers the trouble that all work and then, when you get into trouble, yell racism, you can exercise do not perform, and make sure that nobody else can, then you can enjoy short power, buzz but probably not the type that could lead to anything that someone else might call success.

And if you're the kind of person that has black so you can say you are black, black friends friends friends you escape when they cease to be pets start to have opinions, and that you use the word "racism" lot, then you'll probably spend much time in a beautiful haze of complacency, but you're also probably not much to make the lives of black, brown or any other persons to do better.

Last week at an event on multiculturalism and integration, organized by a wonderful organization called point of faith, I was also monstered.Un harsh Jewish man, which had accused me of anti-Semitism abusive e-mails sent .a very polished, Muslim woman who did step sent me emails on the responsibilities of the media and to know if writing about female genital mutilation and marriages forced in the Muslim community, I was guilty of peddler, stereotypes and the mythes.Vous could, I suppose, call something that occur as often a stereotype or a myth, but the usual word I have explained, is a fact.

?

Follow Christina Patterson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/queenchristina_

This entry transmitted via the service for full-text RSS - if this is your content and you read on someone to another site, please read our FAQ page fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Article five filters features: After Hiroshima - non-rapport Cancer Catastrophe of Fallujah.


View the original article here